Saturday, June 25, 2016

Mr. Gaffney's Case Unravelling




========================================================================
Not Legal Advice

Because Mr. Gaffney has refused to answer the Interrogatories, a Motion to Compel Answers is being sent to the Court. The Motion explains how the Interrogatories are relevant to the case. See below.

Although Mr. Gaffney has claimed damage to his business, he has not provided any evidence of any daamage. He claims that he suffered mental anguish, but he has not answered any question about his medical or mental health. Mr. Gaffney claims that his " political capital" was damaged, yet he has not answered the question about what is political capital.

If Mr. Gaffney can not or will not provide evidence of damage or harm, then his case falls apart and could be determined to be frivolous.
========================================================================

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS


WORCESTER, ss. SUPERIOR COURT
           C. A. NO. 2016-00288 B


_______________________
MICHAEL T. GAFFNEY
Plaintiff,
V.
INCITY TIMES
ROSALIE TIRELLA
GORDON T. DAVIS
Defendants.
_______________________


DEFENDANT GORDON T. DAVIS’ REQUEST FOR MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE CRITICAL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES.

Defendant Gordon T. Davis (Davis) respectfully requests the Court to compel

Plaintiff Michael T. Gaffney (Gaffney) to answer critical interrogatories in the

Defamation lawsuit (Exhibit 1)

On May 4, 2016 the Defendant served the Plaintiff with two sets of Interrogatories.

(Exhibit 2).

Those Interrogatories included the following which were not answered by the

Plaintiff.



INTERROGATORY NO. 2
Please identify each and all persons who has knowledge of any fact relating in any manner of the events, transactions or occurrences that are described in the Complaint and in any pleading setting forth a claim or defense or counterclaim in this action, and for each such person state:
a.      Name, address and telephone number
b.    Describe to the best of your knowledge the subject matter and facts about which they have knowledge and in what capacity or circumstance they acquired such knowledge;
c.      State whether or not you or any of your agents, attorneys, servants or employees know of the existence of, have taken or have in your or their possession a statement (as defined in Mass.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(3) made by or taken from such a person concerning this action or its subject matter; and
d.    Indicate whether or not you intend to call the person as a witness at trial.
The Plaintiff has failed to provide an answer regarding who has knowledge of the event. The Plaintiff references several documents in his response to Interrogatory No. 16. He does not indicated from whom he obtained these documents nor the names of witnesses with knowledge of the facts.

INTERROGATORY NO. 4
Please describe the nature and date of all illnesses, accidents or injuries from which you have suffered up to and including the present date.

Please include any treatment for Mental Anguish and any other mental illness or condition
The Plaintiff is claiming “mental anguish” as harm done to him. The Plaintiff has failed to answer questions about his health, mental health or condition, nor pain and suffering. The Defendant is entitled to this information as material facts in his defense.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5
Please state the identity of any and all clients who engaged you as an “attorney” in the past five years, including in your answer the address of any such person, the date any such person hired you as an “attorney”, the purpose of your legal counsel and the forum in which you practiced in the interest of any such person.
     The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business.
INTERROGATORY NO. 6
For any legal counsel described in your answer to Interrogatory No. 5, please state (a) whether you had a fee agreement with your legal counsel client, (b) the date of any such fee agreement, (c) the amount of any fee received from any such advocacy client and (d) the amount due from each such legal counsel client.
The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.
          INTERROGATORY NO. 7
For any legal counsel client described in your answer to Interrogatory No. 5, please state whether any legal counsel client terminated your employment or engagement based upon statements made by the Defendants.
     The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.

INTERROGATORY NO. 8
If your claim is that you have been denied employment or engagement as an attorney by any person based solely upon statements allegedly made by either one or all Defendants, please state:  (a) the name of any such potential client for advocacy service, (b) the date or dates on which you believe you would have served as an attorney for any such potential client, (c) the amount of income you could reasonably have expected to have received from any such potential client.
     The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm


INTERROGATORY NO.  9
If your services as an “attorney” have ever been terminated or declined for reasons other than statements made by the Defendants, please state (a) the date or dates on which you have been so terminated or declined for service as an advocate, (b) the exact reason for your having been terminated, (c) the name and address of any client who has terminated your services, and (d) the amount of income lost by any such termination.
The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.


INTERROGATORY NO. 10
If you referred legal counsel clients to attorneys, please state:  (a) the name and address of any attorney to whom you have referred advocacy clients, (b) the date or dates on which you have referred advocacy clients to each such attorney, (c) whether you have a referral agreement with any such attorney whereby you continue to render advocacy services after referral and (d) the amounts paid to you by any client or attorney after referral to an attorney.
      The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.


INTERROGATORY NO. 11
Please identify in detail all losses and damages claimed in your complaint, including in your answer the exact nature of any such loss or damage, date or dates any such loss or damage was incurred, the amounts of any such loss or damage and the method by which any such valuation of damages was calculated.
     The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.

INTERROGATORY NO. 12
Please describe your complete employment history, stating as to each job:  (a) the dates of your employment, (b) the name and address of your employer, (c) your job title, (d) your hourly, weekly or monthly rate of compensation and actual earnings received and (e) your reason for separation from this employment.
     The Plaintiff is claiming his business has been harmed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not provided information about his business and the likelihood that the Plaintiff’s business could generate one million dollars in income. This information is needed in order for the Defendant to compare year to year income and services. This would be material facts in whether the Defendant caused any loss of business. The Plaintiff has not provided any evidence that the Plaintiff has suffered any loss or harm.
          INTERROGATORY NO. 14
Please state the name, current address of each person who was a witness to or has any knowledge of any occurrence, event, fact, circumstance or discoverable matter upon which your claim is based or founded, specifying each occurrence, event, fact, circumstance or discoverable matter each such person was a witness to or had knowledge.
     The Plaintiff has failed to provide an answer who has knowledge
of the events. The Plaintiff references several documents in his response to Interrogatory No. 16. He does not indicated how he obtained these documents nor the names of witnesses with knowledge of the facts.

INTERROGATORY NO. 17
Please describe your relationship(s) with Turtleboy Sports or any of its employees, whether it was business, quid pro quo, or any other.
    The answer to this question is related to two of the Defendant’s affirmative defenses. The Second Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff reputation was so tarnished that the Defendant could not have tarnished it further. The Third Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff filed this instant frivolous lawsuit as a mean to retaliate against the Defendant for Davis’s legal actions against Turtleboy Sports and Aiden Kearney.
          INTERROGATORY NO. 18
 Did you in any manner correspond with Turtle Boy Sports or any its employees before filing your instant Complaint?
     The answer to this question is related to two of the Defendant’s affirmative defenses. The Second Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff reputation was so tarnished that the Defendant could not have tarnished it further. The Third Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff filed this instant frivolous lawsuit as a mean to retaliate against the Defendant for Davis’s legal actions against Turtleboy Sports and Aiden Kearney.
INTERROGATORY NO. 19
Please describe any and all investigations by Massachusetts Ethic Commission and/or OCPF into any of your professional practices.  Please include the accusations/charges and findings.
     This answer is related to the Defendant’s Second Affirmation Defense which is that the Plaintiff’s reputation was so tarnished that the Defendant could not have tarnished it more.
          INTERROGATORY NO. 20
 Did Turtleboy Sports or Aiden Kearney provided informational to you regarding Mosaic Cultural Center located 41 Piedmont St. Worcester MA? If so what was the information it provided to you?
     The answer to this question is related to two of the Defendant’s affirmative defenses. The Second Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff reputation was so tarnished that the Defendant could not have tarnished it further. The Third Affirmative Defense is that the Plaintiff filed this instant frivolous lawsuit as a mean to retaliate against the Defendant for Davis’s legal actions against Turtleboy Sports and Aiden Kearney.
          INTERROGATORY NO. 21
Have you or any of your friend, acquaintances, family, coworkers, campaign staff used racial or other pejoratives? If please provide the names of those people including the actual pejoratives such as “nigger”, “spic”, faggot, “bitch”.  Please provide the name and relationship to you of each person using the pejorative and the pejorative used.
     This answer is related to the Defendant’s Second Affirmation Defense which is that the Plaintiff’s reputation was so tarnished that the Defendant could not have tarnished it more.
         

INTERROGATORY N. 22
 Please provide a legal definition or financial definition of “political capital”.
     Gaffney claims that he was harmed by his loss of “political capital”. The plaintiff failed to provide a legal or any definition for the term. This answer is critical in order for the Defendant to rebut and evaluate the claim. There has been no evidence what “political capital” is, how it is evaluated, or whether the Plaintiff loss any due to the action of the Defendant.

                   INTERROGATORY NO. 26
26. Please indicate everyone and all people who attended any and all of your fundraising events for any and all of your candidacies for City Council of Worcester MA.    
 The event that the Plaintiff claims is libelous took place at a Plaintiff fundraiser. A witness or the actual perpetrator of the alleged event is likely amount the campaign donors or guest. This answer is critical in the determination of the truth of the claim.

27.  Please provide everyone and all people who contributed anything to your campaigns for City Councillor. Please include contributors of money and in kind contributions.
     The event that the Plaintiff claims is libelous took place at a Plaintiff fundraiser. A witness or the actual perpetrator of the alleged event is likely amount the campaign donors or guests. This answer is critical in the determination of the truth of the claim.
INTERROGATORY NO. 28
28.Please refer to Worcester Magazine stories attached to instant Questions. Did you author any of the social media posts with your name appearing in the reference Worcester Magazine stories?
The answer is related to the Defendant’s Second Affirmative Defense. The Plaintiff reputation is so tarnished that it could not have been further tarnished by Defendant’s actions.


RELIEF SOUGHT
The Defendant respectfully asks the Court to compel the Plaintiff to answer the Defendant’s Interrogatories and to cooperate in a good faith and professional manner during Discovery.  The Plaintiff is suing the Defendant for one million dollars. The Plaintiff should provide the answers, documents and evidence to support his claims. The Defendant is deserving of the evidence to be found in Discovery to defend himself from what could be a ruinous matter .
Respectfully Submitted
By the Pro Se Defendant

                                               
Gordon T. Davis                                                                                                                                                  

No comments:

Post a Comment