Saturday, August 20, 2016

Filing a False Affidavit Is a Form of Perjury


Perjury and Scams

Ms. Melican has filed a second Motion for a Protective Order for Turtleboy and Aiden Kearney. The Court Rules compel her to send a copy of the Motion to my attention. I am then able to write an Oppostion Memo which Ms. Melican is required to send together with her Motion for a Protective Order.

Not only did Ms. Melican not provide a copy of the Motion for Protective Order for TurtleBoy and Aiden Kearmey, she lied to the Court that she did. This is a form of perjury.

The evidence for the perjury is found in the Rule 9A Notice of Filing by Ms. Melican which makes no mention of Defendant's Opposition Memo. The Rule 9A Affidavit requires at least a mention of any Opposition Memo or lack of one.

I sent a email to Ms. Melican memorializing the issues. I am preparing an Opposition Memo which I will have to write quickly and rush it to Court.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: standards2100 <standards2100@aol.com>
To: margaretmelicanm <margaretmelicanm@aol.com>; michaelgaffneylaw <michaelgaffneylaw@gmail.com>; hector <hector@pineirolegal.com>; Standards2100 <Standards2100@aol.com>
Sent: Sun, Aug 21, 2016 1:19 am
Subject: Motion for Protective Order 8-21-16

Dear Ms. Melican, 

I received your Notice of Filing for a protective order for your clients Turtleboy and Aiden Kearney on Friday August 19, 2016. There are a multitude of problems with the filing. I am writing you to memorialize the issues.

1. All of your documents are unsigned. I believe that they are unsigned in order for you  to run a scam on the Courts and this pro se Plaintiff. I intend to ask the Court to compel you to send me executed documents.

2. You never sent to me your "Motion of Aiden Kearney and Turtleboy Digital Marketing LLC for a Protective Order". Please send to me a signed copy of that Motion. I intend to mention your failure to do so to the Court.

3. You failed to provide to me a copy of your "Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for Protection". I intend to mention this to the Court. Please send me a sign copy of that Memo.

4. You did not send to me a copy of your Rule 9A Affidavit. I intend to mention to the Court. Please send a signed copy of that Affidavit.

5. We never had a telephone conversation or an in-person meeting regarding the Motion found in Item 1. Therefore any Rule 9C Affidavit us bogus and out of compliance with the  Court Rules. I intend to mention this to the Court. Please send me a signed copy of your Rule 9C Affidavit.

6. You have perjured yourself in filing a Rule 9A Affidavit. Your Rule 9A Notice of Filing does not in any way mention the Opposition Memo of the Defendant to the Witnesses Motion for a Protective Order. Since you never sent the Motion for a Protective Order, I could not have written an Opposition Memo to your Motion.
  As you know, being a licensed lawyer and former judge, Rule 9A requires the Opposition Memo to be sent with the Motion for a Protective Order.  Your Rule 9A Affidavit as mentioned in your Notice of Filing is a form of perjury. I intend to metion this to the Court. 

I also plan to complain to the Board of Overseers regarding your perjury, unprofessional behavior, and other activities that reflect badly on your profession.

Regards,


Gordon T. Davis
Pro Se Plaintiff

No comments:

Post a Comment